Magnetic Tape Could be the Big Data Storage Media of the Not Too Distant Future

Monitor: Magnetic tape to the rescue | The Economist

Captured by

As the pace of data generation increases, the amount of that data we want to store for some period will also increase. At some point (if it hasn’t happened already), the volume of data we want to store will exceed our manufacturing capability for hard drive (mechanical and solid-state). Now is probably the time to be thinking about how we re-introduce tape libraries into our data processing stacks.

Given how much faster the data streaming rate is for data that comes off of tape versus data being pulled from a hard drive, I wonder how difficult it would be to create a MapReduce job which gets its input from locally attached tape drives instead of traditional storage. If up front thought and consideration for such processing were done, I think it would be a very interesting experiment.

Tape is the oldest computer storage medium still in use. It was first put to work on a UNIVAC computer in 1951. But although tape sales have been falling since 2008 and dropped by 14% in 2012, according to the Santa Clara Consulting Group, tape’s decline has now gone into reverse: sales grew by 1% in the last quarter of 2012 and a 3% rise is expected this year.


The NSA Can Afford To Store Data From Years Of Phone Calls

There’s a lot to think about here, a lot of moving parts, but I think the author has captured the essence of what will undoubtedly become an issue in the very near future.

While the NSA is currently saying they only capture a small portion of the metadata about calls being made, if it is in fact the case that the actual recordings of our phone calls can be captured and archived for a relatively small amount (both up front capital and ongoing operational expense), I expect that it will happen if it isn’t already.

The NSA Can Afford To Store Data From Years Of Phone Calls